Ever get the feeling youâre the âagile personâ in the roomâbrought in to run ceremonies, fix Jira boards, or play Scrum cop, but never actually invited to shape real strategy? If that hits close to home, youâll want to listen in on my latest conversation with Michael Gerharz. Michaelâs a computer scientist by training, but these days heâs known for helping leaders and teams find the right words so their ideas land, rather than getting tossed in the trash. We dug into why so many agilists get stuck in what I call Process Theater: going through the motions, checking the boxes, but never really influencing the game. Michael sees the same patternâagile as theater, not progressâand heâs got some hard-won insights about why itâs so damn hard to speak uncomfortable truths in organizations that just want to âdo agileâ rather than be agile. We riffed on three big themes: Michael introduced his PATH framework (Plain, Actionable, Transformative, Heartfelt) as a practical way for agile leaders to bridge the gapâditch the jargon, speak the language of the business, and connect with what actually matters to stakeholders. If youâve ever felt like your agile expertise is being wasted on the wrong conversations, this episode will give you new ways to break the cycle. Get the latest episode of the Scaling w/ Agility Podcast on your favorite Podcast player, or watch on YouTube: â â PS: What do you think about the podcast? I'd love your feedback! Or even a quick word of encouragement to keep going... â Yours, |
Are You Struggling to Scale Your Organization ? Need agility but dubious of process BS/dogma? I share reflective, pragmatic, principled takes on how to approach scaling your organization leveraging the essence (rather than theater) of product operating models, agile practices and frameworks, and business operating systems such as EOS and OKRs.
Hey Reader, I have a question for you. Let's say you're in the market for some agility improvement service. What kind of guarantee would help you differentiate between services that are likely to end up in agile theater vs ones that will guide you to improved outcomes? Here's the thing - We've been buying (and selling) Agile "Features" for way too long: Training (you're guaranteed to get a certificate of completion. Some even guarantee you'll pass the exam...) Mechanics (You're guaranteed to...
Hey Reader, Most days, it feels like mentioning Agile anywhere in your online presence is like the GenAI Emdash. A troll magnet. That makes it harder (maybe even unsafe) to have a real conversation. share nuanced opinions. (And its even less safe to talk about SAFe...) If you're a leader working on improving your organization, should you only listen to people that DON'T talk about Agile? That don't have any SAFe association? Does not mentioning their Agile association immediately mean that...
Picture this: you've a breakthrough strategic initiative tied to one of your company-level goals that impacts 10 teams across two product groups, as well as your GTM organization. These are all busy, overloaded teams. Those same 10 teams are also juggling five other initiatives. And the business-as-usual whirlwind. You pull this work into the backlogs and roadmaps for all these teams. Fractional slices of people across the teams will work on this. Which means it will take a while. Leaders...