How To Choose An Owner For a Cross-Organization Initiative


Reader Kevin had this question about Cross-Product Initiative Ownership:
"How should we choose an Initiative (or Epic) Owner when multiple parts of the organization will be responsible for delivery?"

That is a good question that often comes up in the trenches when I'm helping organizations apply product-oriented agile thinking to cross-organization initiatives.

Here's how I think about it: Initiative Ownership is about the Why and the What more than the How.

Ask yourself - who is the best person to:

  • Act as a visionary for their strategic initiative.
  • Own the Outcomes
  • Connect to customers
  • Collaborate with a multitude of teams on finding creative and effective ways to test and deliver outcomes.
  • Make critical decisions and decentralize when possible while providing clarity and context.
  • Focus on the risks/uncertainties and create discovery and delivery plans that provide ample opportunity to inspect, adapt, or stop.
  • Leverage influence to drive collaboration towards outcomes across multiple products and departments.

Want a shortcut? Cross-product initiatives often have a "lead" organization closest to the outcomes we're trying to unlock.

The Initiative Owner often comes from that organization. Even if other teams have more work to enable/deliver the desired outcomes.

Yours,

Yuval

PS I've spent quite a bit of time in recent months training and coaching Initiative/Epic Owners on moving from project/delivery focus to product and evidence-based thinking. Let me know if you're interested to learn more about what that looks like.

Scaling w/ Agility

Are You Struggling to Scale Your Organization ? Need agility but dubious of process BS/dogma? I share reflective, pragmatic, principled takes on how to approach scaling your organization leveraging the essence (rather than theater) of product operating models, agile practices and frameworks, and business operating systems such as EOS and OKRs.

Read more from Scaling w/ Agility

Context is King You’ve probably encountered this term in the context of AI. You won’t get far with AI, even with amazing prompting techniques, if AI doesn’t have the right context. Many people focus on the Data aspect of context – what’s in our CRM, in our collaboration tools, in our ERP, in any of our vertical systems. Another interesting aspect is the intent – what are we trying to achieve? What is our strategy? What problems are we focused on? Who are the players? Some of that information...

Hey Reader, Before you fix teams, fix the system they operate in. Most organizations focus their improvement efforts at the team, program, or product level while maintaining the same organizational operating system—how they make decisions, fund work, and measure success. These teams might be using the latest and greatest processes (Agile, Product Model, Lean Startup, take your pick) but they still need to manage countless dependencies. The funding and GTM processes are still following classic...

When Vered and I got married, my father-in-law gave me a very nice watch as a wedding gift. I didn’t wear a watch that often at the time. I wore the watch, but it didn’t transform me. It provided the service of telling the time, but even back in 2004, we had phones that had clocks. And I was and am pretty punctual so didn’t need that transformation. (And when you’re in Engineering/IT leadership, nobody cares about the watch you wear… at least in Israel… ) Don’t tell Eli, but that watch spent...