How To Choose An Owner For a Cross-Organization Initiative


Reader Kevin had this question about Cross-Product Initiative Ownership:
"How should we choose an Initiative (or Epic) Owner when multiple parts of the organization will be responsible for delivery?"

That is a good question that often comes up in the trenches when I'm helping organizations apply product-oriented agile thinking to cross-organization initiatives.

Here's how I think about it: Initiative Ownership is about the Why and the What more than the How.

Ask yourself - who is the best person to:

  • Act as a visionary for their strategic initiative.
  • Own the Outcomes
  • Connect to customers
  • Collaborate with a multitude of teams on finding creative and effective ways to test and deliver outcomes.
  • Make critical decisions and decentralize when possible while providing clarity and context.
  • Focus on the risks/uncertainties and create discovery and delivery plans that provide ample opportunity to inspect, adapt, or stop.
  • Leverage influence to drive collaboration towards outcomes across multiple products and departments.

Want a shortcut? Cross-product initiatives often have a "lead" organization closest to the outcomes we're trying to unlock.

The Initiative Owner often comes from that organization. Even if other teams have more work to enable/deliver the desired outcomes.

Yours,

Yuval

PS I've spent quite a bit of time in recent months training and coaching Initiative/Epic Owners on moving from project/delivery focus to product and evidence-based thinking. Let me know if you're interested to learn more about what that looks like.

Scaling w/ Agility

Are You Struggling to Scale Your Organization ? Need agility but dubious of process BS/dogma? I share reflective, pragmatic, principled takes on how to approach scaling your organization leveraging the essence (rather than theater) of product operating models, agile practices and frameworks, and business operating systems such as EOS and OKRs.

Read more from Scaling w/ Agility

Today's email is more about my business than about agility or product itself. Hang in there - there's a connection to product discovevry/validation as a bonus sidenote ... A follower reached out earlier today - "Yuval, When’s the next time you’re teaching a SAFe RTE class?" Here’s the deal. I rarely schedule open enrollment training workshops anymore. Why? The market is crowded with more and more trainers. There’s less demand for certification classes compared to the past The whole dynamics...

Should you focus on mastering organizational traction or on establishing portfolio agility? Let me tell you a secret: In my experience, mastering organization traction involves realizing you have a portfolio of investments you’re managing. So actually the paths converge… The difference is that mastering organizational traction extends beyond the IT/Product world. It intercepts business initiatives before becoming mandates for the technology organization. It also manages non-digital...

“Agile is so great we need to use it for EVERYTHING” “Agile is so much overhead, we stopped using it for ANYTHING” Are you also trying to navigate what to do with Agile? Whether it’s worth the overhead? After years of helping a diverse group of organizations figure out where and how to use agile methods, here's what I've learned... If you want the TL;DR version - Agile has the potential to shine when …. There’s enough risk and uncertainty to justify the overhead of frequent feedback loops....