Alice wants her product organization to adopt a product operating model because she believes it’s the future of working. She’s been an early adopter of agile and lean startup methods and is constantly looking for better ways to work. Bob wants their product organization to adopt a product operating model because they have an expensive problem—they were brought in to help scale a product organization. With 12 product teams working on a line/portfolio of products, there’s little consistency, little alignment to outcomes, and little predictability. Charlie heard about a product operating model from their analyst at Gortner. Then, the Partner at McLoitte, with whom they’re working, suggested it might be the next big step in their organization’s transformation. WDYT? Which of these product/tech leaders will get more out of their investment in adopting a product operating model? Alice is motivated by ambition. She is one of a rare breed of leaders whose ambition is oriented around the How, not the What. She knows that being proactive and creating a great organization will eventually impact her organization’s results. Alice is willing to invest in improvement even if it’s not directly connected to a top-of-mind, expensive problem. She’s even excited to try new things for the sake of innovating. Bob is motivated by desire. They have a real problem to solve. For Bob, any work on ways of working needs to be tightly connected to top-of-mind problems/opportunities that affect the ability of their organization to deliver. Charlie is motivated by status / FOMO (Fear of missing out). If everybody is investing, they will jump on board. What should you do if you’re Alice? Bob? Charlie? How should you approach the Product Operating Model? (Or any similar opportunity? ) : Here’s what I’d do:
Or, in other words, use a product-led mindset to develop and leverage a product operating model. PS Are You a Product/Tech Leader Considering Applying a Product Operating Model? I created a short, no-fluff podcast-style series to help you navigate the landscape of evolving from a feature factory to a product-oriented organization. Check it out. Let me know what you think. 🎧 Send Me the Audio Training Yours, |
Are You Struggling to Scale Your Organization ? Need agility but dubious of process BS/dogma? I share reflective, pragmatic, principled takes on how to approach scaling your organization leveraging the essence (rather than theater) of product operating models, agile practices and frameworks, and business operating systems such as EOS and OKRs.
What’s the future of Agile? Agility? Agile as a career choice? Yesterday, I joined Jonathan Stark on his podcast Ditching Hourly to discuss the current state of Agile as a platform, how it has evolved over the years, and what practitioners should consider as the platform matures. Jonathan primarily focuses on advice for freelancers/consultants on ditching hourly billing through positioning, productized services, and pricing advice. If, like me, you’re a freelancer/solopreneur agile...
Engineers excited about LLMs, Agentic AI, RAGs, spending time going to the vendors, playing around like kids with new toys. Without a real problem in mind. Without the ability to deploy any of it in the organization (the engineers don’t talk to the legal folks much…) Can you think of where so much time and energy is spent on a technical innovation without connecting it to a real problem? Of course you can… Mobile, Cloud, Big Data, just to think of a couple of recent examples. To be honest, I...
How can an Agile Product Operating Model (APOM) enhance how organizations use SAFe? I had several conversations with product leaders this week where this question came up. Organizations that are struggling with SAFe Theater and want to see much more empowerment, outcome orientation, and evidence-driven decision making and steering. They realize SAFe has helped them evolve from charos towards a stable “Feature Factory”, and they are now setting their aim for becoming a “Product Lab”. If this...